Metagenome sequencing and 768 microbial genomes from chilly seep in South China Sea

Ceramicola, S., Dupré, S., Somoza, L. & Woodside, J. in Submarine Geomorphology (eds Aaron Micallef, Sebastian Krastel, & Alessandra Savini) 367-387 (Springer Worldwide Publishing, 2018).

Ruff, S. E. et al. World dispersion and native diversification of the methane seep microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4015–4020 (2015).

ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Feng, D. et al. Chilly seep programs within the South China Sea: An summary. J. Asian Earth Sci. 168, 3–16 (2018).

ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Zhang, X. et al. In situ Raman detection of fuel hydrates uncovered on the seafloor of the South China Sea. Geochem. Geophy. Geosy. 18, 3700–3713 (2017).

ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Zhang, X. et al. Improvement of a brand new deep-sea hybrid Raman insertion probe and its utility to the geochemistry of hydrothermal vent and chilly seep fluids. Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I 123, 1–12 (2017).

ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Cao, L. et al. In situ detection of the superb scale heterogeneity of energetic chilly seep surroundings of the Formosa Ridge, the South China Sea. Journal of Marine Programs 218, 103530 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Du, Z., Zhang, X., Xue, B., Luan, Z. & Yan, J. The functions of the in situ laser spectroscopy to the deep-sea chilly seep and hydrothermal vent system. Stable Earth Sciences 5, 153–168 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Wang, B. et al. A novel monitorable and controlable long-coring system with most working depth 6000 m. Marine Sciences 42, 25–31 (2018).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Du, Z. et al. In situ Raman quantitative detection of the chilly seep vents and fluids within the chemosynthetic communities within the South China Sea. Stable Earth Sciences 5, 153–168 (2018).

ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, Okay. & Lam, T. W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node resolution for giant and complicated metagenomics meeting through succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for strong and environment friendly genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Nissen, J. N. et al. Improved metagenome binning and meeting utilizing deep variational autoencoders. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 555–560 (2021).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Wu, Y. W., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin 2.0: an automatic binning algorithm to get well genomes from a number of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32, 605–607 (2016).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Uritskiy, G. V., DiRuggiero, J. & Taylor, J. MetaWRAP-a versatile pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic information evaluation. Microbiome 6, 158 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B. & Banfield, J. F. dRep: a software for quick and correct genomic comparisons that permits improved genome restoration from metagenomes by de-replication. ISME J. 11, 2864–2868 (2017).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Chaumeil, P. A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to categorise genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2019).

PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the standard of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a brand new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation web site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 119 (2010).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Quick and delicate protein alignment utilizing DIAMOND. Nat. Strategies 12, 59–60 (2015).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: a number of sequence alignment with excessive accuracy and excessive throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a software for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Worth, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2–roughly maximum-likelihood timber for giant alignments. PLoS One 5, e9490 (2010).

ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892585 (2022).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892586 (2022).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892587 (2022).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892588 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892589 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892590 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892591 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892592 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892593 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892594 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892595 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892596 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892597 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892598 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892599 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892600 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892601 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892602 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892603 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892604 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892605 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892606 (2021).

NCBI Sequence Learn Archive https://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR13892607 (2021).

Zhang, H. et al. Metagenome sequencing and 768 microbial genomes from chilly seep in South China Sea, figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16625644.v1 (2022).

Eisenhofer, R. et al. Contamination in Low Microbial Biomass Microbiome Research: Points and Suggestions. Developments Microbiol. 27, 105–117 (2019).

CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 

Salter, S. J. et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically influence sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 12, 87 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar 

Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar